This post is part of an ongoing (although
intermittent) series of fictional chats between an architect and an intern in the
architect’s Northern California studio.
Sitting at a redwood picnic table near the edge
of a small meadow, having lunch, and reviewing the intern’s last six months’
progress, the architect continues with a surprisingly direct question:
A. How
successful do you want to be?
I. I
would like to do work that serves the client well and allows for the fulfillment
of my skill and aptitude. I would consider that successful.
A. And how do you think you are doing in
regards to this quest? I mean, do you
think you are on track?
I. I
think I’m doing pretty well. Many of my
classmates are working in medium sized commercial
and institutional offices and seemingly not getting much exposure to the breadth of architecture I’ve been
experiencing here. I’m probably learning
more here than I would have in
graduate school. To be truthful I feel
like I haven’t fully absorbed the
“Office Standards” and “Basic Design Thoughts” we’ve been discussing.
These are really pretty disarming – They appear simple enough yet somehow always elusive and it seems you
are continually redirecting me…or pointing
out exceptions… or critiquing my judgment.
A. That’s
what God put me here for.
I. I
guess I just need time to mature and develop.
A. That’s
true, but you can accelerate the process by proactively pursuing information and looking for answers – almost as a basic
mindset.
I. Most
of the time I don’t quite know what to even ask…I see your process here in the studio, but I don’t have a clue what
in the world is truly driving it. You or
it.
A. One
of the great values of pursuing information and answers is that eventually you come to
realize that, perhaps unfortunately, no one has answers to give you. They may
be able to impart a little bit of
wisdom here and there, but, alas, you’re going to have to find things out for yourself. I always used to pump strong designers for information which might reveal their
secrets, but I never found them. What I
did find was insight into who, how, and
why they were who they were.
I. I
can accept that, but, nevertheless, how do you go about thinking about things?
A. These
days I mostly just do, but I suppose I could generalize a little. I mostly consider
things based on my own life’s perceptions and experiences. Second, I think
about how I would like to see things in an ideal world. Third, I consider input from others – outside sources, and fourth, I
consider the governing laws and regulations
in effect at the time. These are practical matters that (to quote
Dylan) can come in with the
tide and be gone with the wind. Mostly they just
keep coming.
That’s pretty much my order of allegiance. Yours might well be different. For
some architects the plethora of directives from governing agencies is about all
they think about.
By
far your own values and life experiences…goals and skills are what inform your thinking.
Look, this is not all that difficult, or perhaps it’s a level of
difficulty that is off the charts…the
way to get better is to get better. Just
do it.
Here’s
a helpful tip though – be highly suspicious of sources that claim to know what others are thinking or why they are doing what
they do. I dismiss this drivel in favor of what someone actually does…actions
speak louder than words. And one more thing, responsibility
is a basic goal to be pursued. Without
responsibility you’re very likely
to lose substance.
I. Excellent. I’m glad to know there is really nothing much
to work on. I was afraid I was going to have to work my brains out or
something.
A. And
you may very well have to, but if this, in and of itself, is not a good and rewarding experience then you probably won’t
be very successful. For me success is the gratification
of achieving results well beyond the status quo and the thrill of searching for (and possibly even finding) that
mythical goal of Sullivan’s “doing things
right.”
I. Talking
too much aesthetics can be brain numbing, but now I’ve got one more thing: Sometimes
I’m dismayed by how narrow sighted people are only thinking of themselves.
All of us. And you say?
A. At
the dawn of time that was probably a perfectly good trait to have. It’s dominant in virtually every other species on earth. It’s just that now with our technical
dominance other traits – like compassion
and foresight – have come to have an important role in our survival. And
probably for other species’ survival as well.
But don’t let that dash your
hopes for humanity – there are numerous thoughtful, insightful folks around – they’re just not making a lot of
noise about it.
I. I
wonder how this movie ends.
A. I
think there are many different possible endings. Casablanca’s was pretty good…
I. What
do you think about my getting a raise?
No comments:
Post a Comment