The scene: Beginning of the
workweek at an architect’s studio somewhere in Northern California. The seasoned old architect/mentor is greeted
by his protégé, a young intern not long removed from architecture school lingering
at the architect’s drawing table:
I.
Good Morning, Boss.
A. How’s it going Michelangelo?
I.
You really think I’m doing that well? This is pretty flattering...
A. Don’t let it go to your head…I’m not an infallible judge of character,
let alone world-class artistic genius.
I. Have you got a few minutes?
I’ve been thinking about something and I’d like to run
it by you. Is this an OK time?
A. It’s fine, what’s on your mind?
I. I’ve been thinking a lot lately about good and bad. It seems like everything, every architect, and everyone else for that
matter...in spite of their stature and accomplishments
always have their flaws and shortcomings…where are the great role models?
I was thinking about Louis Kahn with all his poetic insight into humanity and architecture and here
he had two different families and was running two
different households. Our founding
fathers, Washington, Jefferson, Hamilton and
Franklin all had plenty to criticize.
What do you say about that?
A. And you’re just now noticing that the world’s not perfect?
Man is a complex creature with a whole range of qualities and potentials, and
they range from the saintly to the
horrific. And then there are women.
I. Dishonesty, infidelity, segregation…
A. I think it’s presumptuous to think one can stand in another’s
shoes, especially if he or she is
from a different generation or culture. Looking
back on different times and different
places and making moral judgments is iffy at best. We’re all very
much influenced by our upbringing and the time surrounding us. So what do we
do with the hand we are dealt? In any
event whatever criticism may be laid against
us does not negate whatever positive achievements we’ve made.
I
suspect that 200 years from now many of our progeny will look back and wonder how we could have had some of
the thoughts you and I accept today as perfectly
normal. Perhaps herding animals for
slaughter, fighting wars in the name
of religion or philosophy…It’s pretty short sighted to judge the totality of someone’s life just because that life
includes sins. It’s probably important, however, that the good of a life’s work
outweighs the bad.
I. And who is going make those decisions? Good or bad…how good and how bad? I suppose in a free society it’s up to
individuals to figure that out on their own.
It obviously makes sense
that we would want our positive actions to outweigh the negative ones.
Do
we keep tally on a kind of life long score card? We could give Jefferson a few pluses and minuses on his personal
life and more pluses for his architectural and
political accomplishments.
A. When you’re talking far reaching affects on huge swaths of
humanity I’d give him more than a
few pluses. Maybe a few for architecture
and a few more for the University
of Virginia, but writing the Declaration of Independence would be far off the charts. Judging his personal life is a shot in the
dark. Viewpoints and times are always changing – I believe
Bob Dylan said that. Life’s quality is inversely proportional to human
quantity – I said that!
I. Quite poetic. Who’d
have thought.
A. And to think I actually had to take dumbbell English. In my world we need to focus on the thought and skill which results
in the positive and disregard labeling and
name calling: brutalist, transcendentalist, racist, liberal, conservative…
Another
thought: stick with what you know. If you establish a point of anchorage and move out from there you can occasionally
look back and evaluate the direction you
are heading.
I. That sounds good, but finding an anchor point is surely a
lot easier said than done.
A. Fair enough. It might
not be easy and it probably won’t just happen overnight. You
think and work and reflect and eventually something begins to merge out of the ether.
I. Ohoooooo…
A. It’s not ethereal, but it’s not simple, formulaic thinking
either. In fact it’s only partially thinking…and partially feeling
and partially demanding…
I. Demanding what?
A. Demanding or insisting to be a step beyond the status quo. This is Steve Martino, Mike Reynolds, Smiljan Radic - not
the popular group think magazine serving of the
month.
I. I’m losing track of what we’re even talking about.
A. We’re talking about the ability to use peripheral
vision. To see beyond the short sighted narcissism that is commonplace, and
grapple with the bigger picture. Too
many of us view the world as little more than a snapshot of what is in it for us…for right now…with no
sense of the past or future.
I. I’m not sure I would recognize the bigger picture even if I
saw it.
A. Try harder. Why don’t you
start searching on your work station right about now?
Try harder - I need to. It's easy to forget to think about the bigger picture...but it's always there.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing!